Emerging Scholars Interdisciplinary Network
New @ ESIN
Upcoming Events
- 5th Annual International Conference on Sociology
- Call for Papers and Participation, Deadline: October 11, 2010
- The Forgotten Epidemic HIV/AIDS: Crisis in Black America
- Deadline for Abstract Submission: September 8, 2010
- 2011 American Men's Studies Association Conference: Men, Masculi
- Deadline for Submissions: October 31, 2010
ESIN News
- Professional Opportunity
- Rutgers University School of Social Work, Two Tenure-Track Faculty Positions
- Professional Opportunity
- University of North Dakota, One-year Visiting Assistant Professor, Counseling Psychology
- ESIN Congratulates
- Otima Doyle, PhD, MSW
- Professional Opportunity
- University of Michigan National Center for Institutional Diversity, Postdoctoral Program
- Funding Opportunity
- Health Promotion Among Racial and Ethnic Minority Males (R01)
- Social Work Resource
- The Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research presents their new website
Scientific Update
- Black patients, women miss out on strongest medications for...
- Article highlighting research of Carmen Green
- A Meta-Study of Black Male Mental Health and Well-Being
- D.C. Watkins, R.L. Walker, and D.M. Griffith
Scientific News
Religion, Socioeconomics, and Political Behavior...2000 Election
R. Zullo
2010-02-10 11:02:42
How Do Religious Groups Respond to Class and Inequality?: Religion, Socioeconomics, and Political Behavior in the 2000 Election
Roland Zullo
Labor Studies Journal. 2010; 35(1): p. 73-93
http://lsj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/1/73?ct=ct
Abstract:
Using a county-level population analysis, the author examines whether the interaction between religious groups and class and inequality predict voter turnout and voter preference for George W. Bush in the 2000 presidential election. Results indicate that for counties with high densities of mainline Protestants, lower income, and lower education meant depressed voter turnout and higher Bush support; with high densities of Jewish adherents, lower income yielded elevated voter turnout, while lower income along with less education equated with less Bush support; with high densities of Catholics, lower income meant higher voter turnout; with high densities of Evangelicals, lower income yielded depressed voter turnout; however, lower income and less education correlated with less Bush support. These patterns held for county income inequality when median income was controlled. The results challenge the perception that Evangelical groups in lower-SES regions persuaded members and their acquaintances to vote against their economic interests. Rather, the results imply that mainline Protestant groups in lower-SES regions successfully shifted votes to Bush. The findings suggest that outreach by labor and other progressives to Evangelicals, especially those in poorer regions, can lead to political collaboration.
Roland Zullo
Labor Studies Journal. 2010; 35(1): p. 73-93
http://lsj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/1/73?ct=ct
Abstract:
Using a county-level population analysis, the author examines whether the interaction between religious groups and class and inequality predict voter turnout and voter preference for George W. Bush in the 2000 presidential election. Results indicate that for counties with high densities of mainline Protestants, lower income, and lower education meant depressed voter turnout and higher Bush support; with high densities of Jewish adherents, lower income yielded elevated voter turnout, while lower income along with less education equated with less Bush support; with high densities of Catholics, lower income meant higher voter turnout; with high densities of Evangelicals, lower income yielded depressed voter turnout; however, lower income and less education correlated with less Bush support. These patterns held for county income inequality when median income was controlled. The results challenge the perception that Evangelical groups in lower-SES regions persuaded members and their acquaintances to vote against their economic interests. Rather, the results imply that mainline Protestant groups in lower-SES regions successfully shifted votes to Bush. The findings suggest that outreach by labor and other progressives to Evangelicals, especially those in poorer regions, can lead to political collaboration.